Why for the Golden Age of Tech and F/N confusion

From: http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/why-for-the-golden-age-of-tech-and-fn-confusion/ Many people here have pointed out David Miscavige’s technical ”why” that lead to the Golden Age of Tech (the blind have been leading the blind) is not a why since it can lead one to ask “why?” of the “why.”   Others have pointed out that if it were the why, then the “who” would [...]

Continue reading about Why for the Golden Age of Tech and F/N confusion

For years now, I’ve been hearing about DM’s “interpretation” of LRH’s definition of a floating needle and the trouble it has caused both auditors and preclears. The LRH definition as written in HCOB 21 July 1978, WHAT IS A FLOATING NEEDLE is elegant simplicity itself: “A floating needle is a rhythmic sweep of the dial [...]

Continue reading about Coup de Grâce for Auditing?

Friday, 23 October 2009 09:37 Since the passing of Ron, policy has become something to use in a very altered manner to push staff and public into following something called “Command Intention”.  But, whatever ever happened to following just straight LRH Policy? Factually, “Command Intention” has taken orgs and their staff from getting the VFP [...]

Continue reading about Restoring Greatness

Monday, 19 October 2009 15:27 In the recent history of Scientology we have seen the introduction of “Command Intention” as a way to usurp policy. Command in this instance would be the ruling body or force and intention would be what is desired to occur. This means that “command intention” is what the ruling body [...]

Continue reading about Losing Policy

Hello! Please note (to the best of my knowledge) that there is no HCOB that says exactly what Standard Tech is. If there were, I would simply refer to the HCOB and refer others to it. There may be many HCOBs that talk about Standard Tech, but no single issue shows the entire picture. To [...]

Continue reading about An Essay on Standard Tech, by Patricia Krenik