Posts Tagged ‘ FreeZone.Org

FreeZone.Org – CREDIBILITY OF THE RTC

UK PROJECT – THE PRESERVATION OF STANDARD TECH
London, England
BPI

ISSUE OF 17TH SEPTEMBER 1983
(compiled from an issue prepared by the Centre for Personal Enhancement, 15 Birdwood Road, Melville, Western Australia)

CREDIBILITY OF THE RTC

The credibility of the RTC across the world depends upon a number of beliefs being held. If these beliefs are not held, that credibility would disintegrate. Foremost among such beliefs are the following:

ONE:

That the RTC represents Source

The RTC say that they are on-Source. However, if you read the transcript of the US Mission Holders’ Conference, San Francisco, 17th Oct 1982, SO ED 2104 INT, 7th Nov 1982 (and we strongly recommend that you do), you will find that LRH is barely mentioned. They place themselves as the source of an entirely new corporate structure:

“…Prior to the end of 1981, a few of us got together and took a look at the corporate structure of the Church with the view in mind of making it more defensible and more regular and to make an overall improvement.” – WARRANT OFFICER LYMAN SPURLOCK (page 4).

They proceeded to totally invalidate the structure established earlier by LRH:

“look like there’s a whole bunch of corporations dealing with each other and this whole spaghetti that somebody, someone comes in and takes a look at this and they go, “what the hell is this?” They couldn’t understand it.”
“Just to show you how crazy it was,…”
“Kind of a schizophrenic line-up.”
“so, in late 1981 we took a look at this and said, this can’t go on; it’s not very defensible, it doesn’t make sense.”
“…it was kind of loosey-goosey.”– WARRANT OFFICER LYMAN SPURLOCK (pages 4 – 6)

In fact, far from being on-Source, the RTC has attempted to invalidate Source, i.e. LRH.

TWO:

That Ron has been fooled over a long period

According to the RTC scenario, Ron has been fooled for a period of many years by an alleged “bird dog” (ref: SO ED 2344 INT). This person is David Mayo who, during the 1970s, was selected by Ron to wear various Tech hats including those of auditor under LRH as – C/S, C/S under LRH, Senior C/S Flag, C/S for LRS’s auditing, auditor to LRH, Senior C/S International and assistant to LRH on technical research. This was a time of technical excellence and of great expansion for Scientology.

We believe that you will share our view that LRH possesses, amongst his many other abilities, an unparalleled perception, at a theta level, of other beings, and it is a total invalidation, indeed inconceivable and insulting, to depict LRH as being fooled for such a long time.

Does the alleged picture match up to your perception of Ron?

You be the judge.

THREE:

That everything which is now issued over the name of LRH is actually written by him

The RTC claims ownership of the “Trademarks of Scientology” (SO ED 2104 INT). The trademarks include the name “L. Ron Hubbard”, the signature “L. Ron Hubbard”, and the initials “LRH”. Does this mean that they can use Ron’s name as they like? They are certainly exercising their power over the other trademarks to its fullest extent.

It has commonly occurred in the past that others have issued material in Ron’s name in his absence and without his knowledge. When he has returned on lines, such issues have been cancelled. What fate do you think will befall the current issues on David Mayo?

How do we identify a genuine issue?

We can only follow the advice of Ron himself and “Judge a person by his products”.

FreeZone.Org – THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST DAVID MAYO

‘Source 14’, Feb-Mar 78

UK PROJECT FOR THE PRESERVATION OF STANDARD TECH
London, England
ISSUE OF 15TH SEPTEMBER 1983
BPI:

FURTHER DATA

This issue has been prepared for the assistance of those who have read the following documents:

FLAG CONDITIONS ORDER 7138 : WRIT OF EXPULSION AND SUPPRESIVE PERSON DECLARE : DAVID MAYO

SO ED 2344 INT : THE STORY OF A SQUIRREL : DAVID MAYO

We agree with those who control the Church that staff and public should be kept abreast of what is going on within it. (SO ED 2344 INT). They should not mind, therefore, if attention is drawn to certain omissions of fact which occurred in these two issues. Among those omissions, we believe the following to be of particular importance:

The RTC was formed in January 1982 with the primary purpose of ensuring and maintaining the purity and integrity of the religion of Scientology. With reference to that time, SO ED 2344 INT states this:

“Back when the Religious Technology Centre was being formed, Mayo tried desperately, on several occasions, to get himself posted in RTC — he perceived it as a position of power from which he could wreak even more havoc on tech lines — but his attempts to gain this posting were unsuccessful.”

However, as an appendix to this issue you will find a copy of the first page of the Articles of Incorporation of the Religious Technology Centre. You will see that David Mayo is clearly indicated as being among the Incorporators and Initial Trustees of the Corporation. There is also a copy of page 9 upon which appear the signatures of the Incorporators. Again, you can see the name and signature of David Mayo.

Both FCO 7138 and SO ED 2344 INT claim that David deliberately misC/Sed his then wife, Merrill Mayo, by using squirrelled NOTS processes, mixing R/Ds and inventing his own processes all designed to introvert her. Furthermore, it is claimed that he coerced his wife’s auditor to enforce these processes, that he saw to it that she never went to an Examiner after any session and that he kept the folder under lock and key between sessions, refusing to have it reviewed by an outside tech terminal. We read that his wife was reduced to tears asking her C/S (David) to sort out their second dynamic troubles out of session with a Chaplain or Ethics Officer and that he refused.

However, during an interview on 4th July 1983, Merrill Mayo said this:

“All of the things which came out in David’s SP order were completely a false report, every bit of it, with absolutely no grounds at all on Lt. It was made up to make David look as bad as they possibly could.”

Read more